Tuesday, April 29, 2008

KHOODEELAAR! No to "Crossrail hole Lord Cash box, Blair's Chequers massages, Ken Livingstone and Jack Straw's 'laughter' with the BBC's....'...

By©Muhammad Haque
1500 Hrs GMT
London
29 April 2008


Khoodeelaar! examining the 'mayoral' 'election' tv broadcast by Crossrail hole agenda-peddler Ken Livingstone...


"
Lord Cash box, Blair's Chequers massages, Ken Livingstone and Jack Straw's 'laughter' with BBC's Victoria Derbyshire...

"

In that broadcast, Ken Livingstone was imaged in a visual display that could only be assigned to the seeker of a ‘national’ office, rather than to a careerist recidivist engaged for another spot of opportunity to burgle the public in whose name he was given the trust the last two terms.......

But the link to ‘national’ is denser in the psychology of Ken Livingstone than may at first appear from the fact that Livingstone is only claiming to be interested in the ‘London mayor’ job.

And the link is not at all pleasant. Far less antiracist.

The ‘antiracist’ card that the paid ‘fronters’ for Ken Livingstone have been flaunting across the inner city parts of London these past fortnight, making all manner of claims along the line that Livingstone is THE antiracist antidote to the ‘Fascist’ BNP....That card being overplayed by Livingstone would clearly be exposed as another Ken Livingstone sham, another big time Livingstone lie.... if the truth were told and known of just how racist Ken Livingstone is and has been.


As has become very clear in the behaviour of every single one of the Blaired Party’s career timeserving tout for the agenda of Big Business, it would not be surprising in the climate of gloom surrounding Gordon Brown right now that even the Lyingstill Livingstone might be harbouring the ambition of succeeding Brown .....

How is that so?

The behaviour of Jack Straw, for instance.

Even the man of straw, [that is a phrase that I had devised about Straw in the 1980s when he was pretending to be spokesman on education in the Neil DIRE Kinnock’s ‘front bench’ in the House of Commons] was abel to protrude a spontaneous smile flicked in the direction of the BBC’s massage-imbibed Victoria Derbyshire inside a BBC radio studio yesterday [Monday 28 April 2008] as if he felt confident at the target's expense when referring to Carole Caplan’s Chequer’s massages...........

Compared to ken Livingstone's ego and ambition, Jack Straw’s equivalent may yet appear too modest and small...

When Livingstone appeared in that election broadcast, he staged the appearance at the Canary Wharf .... Whence he looked down upon the landscape that lay under his gaze.........As he lied about the thousands of jobs that had been created there!!!!.

Now, Livingstone is criticised, ever so mildly, of course [!!!!!], by his ‘former Labour Party comrades’ [Who and WHAT are they ?????] , many of whom are still MPs - for being a fantasist.

But nobody has as yet actually written anything chronicling the deeply clinical insanity that the man suffers from...

When that mayoral tv broadcast went out, containing Livingstone's words of boasts about rising numbers of jobs... the UK economy had already been in the middle of a marked slowdown... That slowdown is continuing today...

So what kind of nutter had could have authorised - or did authorise pr or did approve that that broadcast should go out ?

Only an insane ‘decision maker’ would have given the go ahead to that sort of content...


But the broadcast did go out...


Evidential note: at 1500 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 29 April 2008:

1: Spelling of the Chequers masseuse Carole [‘Lord Cash box’ ‘Mail on Sunday’ an d the “daily Mail’ 27 and 28 April 2008 - to date, to be checked]

2. [='big business'+’Military Industrial Complex’+ BP+Shell, et al, galore, ‘City of London’ interests] in Britain [notice, for instance, ‘energy-economics minister’ John REDEYED Hutton’s justificatory words via the BBC this morning backing the Multi£Billion profit just announced by SHELL and BP and his total, brazen and politically criminal silence on the question that had been put to him by the presumably still-fully-contaminated BBC junior corespondent about the workers’ right to fair pay....]

[To be continued]

No comments: